In early May I posted a blurb titled Maxim and Cosmo: two of a kind? in which I wrote, “They certainly have the right to yank off (heh) Maxim, Stuff and FHM from their shelves and I can understand how displaying these magazines is offensive to many shoppers. But why not Cosmopolitan and its ilk? Or the trashy romance novels that women buy with the racy covers that objectify men?”
And now this week, the AP reports: First Maxim, now Cosmo: Wal-Mart to obscure covers on women’s magazines.
See, one guy can make a difference. 😉